Copy top investors
Copy top investors
Explore potential price predictions for Phantasma (SOUL) in the years 2026 and 2030. By examining both bullish and bearish market scenarios, we aim to provide a well-rounded perspective on the future of this digital currency.
Trending crypto investors
To provide a comprehensive price prediction and projections for Phantasma (SOUL), we will analyze bullish and bearish market scenarios and their possible reasons.
Phantasma, trading at $0.02003075978648268 with a market capitalization of $2,486,402.140848949, sits in the very small-cap corner of the crypto market. This is the region where sentiment and liquidity can move prices aggressively in both directions. As of early 2025, Phantasma’s circulating supply is close to its total supply cap of roughly 124 million SOUL, which means the project now behaves more like a low float, fully diluted asset rather than an inflationary token.
The broader crypto market has rebounded strongly from the 2022 bear market, with the total crypto market capitalization again trying to hold above the $1.8 trillion to $2 trillion band. Layer 1 and infrastructure narratives continue to dominate, while gaming, NFTs and content-focused chains remain more cyclical and sentiment driven. Phantasma belongs primarily to the gaming and smart content verticals. In a strong risk-on environment, this niche has historically seen outsized percentage moves when attention rotates back to speculative altcoins.
Phantasma’s fundamental angle is a specialized smart contract platform built for gaming, NFTs and digital content, featuring fast block times, low fees and built in NFT capabilities. The protocol is small enough that a handful of successful game launches, marketplace integrations or a significant partnership can have an outsized impact on perceived value. At the same time, that small size means that investor confidence and liquidity are fragile.
In a bullish scenario over the next one to five years, several drivers could converge. A supportive macro backdrop with lower interest rates could push more speculative capital back into small-cap crypto. Stronger regulation clarity in major markets like the United States and the European Union could improve the on ramp for compliant gaming and NFT projects. If Phantasma can position itself as a reliable backend for game studios needing low fee transactions and native NFT tooling, then even a modest share of the growing blockchain gaming market could re-rate the token.
The blockchain gaming market is still nascent. Estimates for 2024 and 2025 value blockchain gaming and web3 entertainment at between $15 billion and $25 billion in aggregate ecosystem value, depending on methodology. By 2030, that figure is projected by various industry analysts to potentially reach the $50 billion to $80 billion range if user adoption and mainstream titles materialize. Even a small protocol capturing one tenth of one percent of that value could, in theory, justify a valuation in the tens of millions of dollars. For a token currently under $3 million in market capitalization, that type of repricing, while speculative, is within the realm of typical small-cap crypto behavior in strong bull markets.
From a tokenomics perspective, the limited remaining emission means upside is primarily a function of demand for SOUL rather than dilution. If the ecosystem can generate steady on-chain activity, NFT minting and in game economies, the perception of SOUL as an essential resource in that environment could support a sustained rerating. Historically, in prior bull cycles, similar gaming infrastructure tokens have seen peak multiples of 20 to 50 times from bear market lows, although those peaks are often short lived and driven by speculative flows rather than fundamentals alone.
Technically, the current price near two cents reflects deep capitulation levels relative to earlier cycle highs. For a small-cap token, moves back to prior structural liquidity zones, such as the ten cent to twenty cent band, are possible if volume returns. On the higher end of the bullish case, a breakout from that zone in a broader altcoin mania phase could push valuations into the low to mid hundreds of millions in market capitalization. That would equate to a significant price multiple from today’s levels but would still leave Phantasma far below the largest gaming or smart contract platforms.
A realistic bullish path involves staged repricing rather than a straight-line move. First, a recovery into the five cent region on improving sentiment and a general small-cap rotation. Second, a re-rating into the ten to twenty cent range if the project ships tangible products, new games or integrations and demonstrates active users and developer traction. The upper bullish bands, extending toward fifty cents or more over several years, would likely require both a broad speculative bubble and clear evidence that the chain underpins one or more commercially relevant gaming or NFT ecosystems.
Below is a data and event driven table summarising potential bullish triggers and their associated price ranges for both the next one to three years and the longer three to five year horizon.
| Possible Trigger / Event | Phantasma (SOUL) Short Term Price (1-3 Years) | Phantasma (SOUL) Long Term Price (3-5 Years) |
|---|---|---|
| Global risk-on rotation: Major central banks cut rates or keep them low, risk appetite returns across global markets and capital flows into small-cap altcoins, lifting Phantasma together with broader gaming narratives. | $0.05 to $0.12 | $0.10 to $0.25 |
| Successful gaming launches: One or more polished games or virtual worlds launch on Phantasma, achieve meaningful daily active users and drive regular NFT trading and token demand across the ecosystem. | $0.08 to $0.18 | $0.20 to $0.45 |
| Major ecosystem partnership: A recognised gaming studio, publisher or large web2 entertainment brand integrates Phantasma infrastructure, giving credibility and creating a clear business use case for SOUL. | $0.10 to $0.22 | $0.25 to $0.55 |
| Market cap re-rating: Investors revalue Phantasma from a micro-cap to a mid-tier gaming chain as its market capitalization climbs from a few million dollars to the $50 million to $150 million band. | $0.15 to $0.30 | $0.35 to $0.60 |
| Regulation and compliance gains: Clearer digital asset rules in regions such as the United States, European Union and parts of Asia make it easier for compliant gaming projects and NFT platforms to build on Phantasma. | $0.06 to $0.14 | $0.18 to $0.35 |
| Cross-chain and exchange access: New bridges, better interoperability and listings on additional tier two or tier one centralized exchanges increase liquidity, daily volume and user access to SOUL. | $0.07 to $0.16 | $0.20 to $0.40 |
In these bullish pathways, the implied valuation bands stretch from roughly $6 million to $70 million in market capitalization in the short term and up toward $75 million to $120 million in the more optimistic long term ranges. Those numbers would still leave Phantasma well below the biggest gaming and metaverse projects, but they show how sensitive a small base can be to capital flows and adoption.
Investors considering the bullish scenario need to weigh several key questions. Can the team consistently ship and maintain infrastructure in a competitive market for gaming chains. Can they attract developers who can deliver fun, sustainable games rather than short-lived speculative loops. And can they build or plug into fiat on ramps and user friendly wallets that make it possible for non crypto native gamers to participate without friction. Bullish potential exists largely because those questions are not yet answered and the market currently prices Phantasma as a high risk, high beta play rather than a proven infrastructure provider.
The bearish scenario for Phantasma reflects both project specific risks and the broader vulnerabilities of small-cap tokens in a maturing but volatile crypto environment. Despite its specialized design for gaming and NFTs, Phantasma faces stiff competition from larger, more liquid chains that increasingly court the same audience. Platforms such as Ethereum layer 2 networks, Solana and other high throughput chains are aggressively targeting game studios with incentives, technical support and established user bases.
At a current price of just above two cents and a market capitalization under $3 million, Phantasma is already in distressed territory compared with the peak valuations that gaming and NFT tokens saw in the 2021 cycle. Many investors view micro-caps as binary bets. Either they catch a narrative wave and re-rate sharply or they gradually lose liquidity, drift downward and become difficult to enter or exit in meaningful size. Once daily trading volume dries up and major exchanges move to delist illiquid assets, the feedback loop can accelerate to the downside.
On the macro front, a sustained period of higher interest rates or renewed inflation pressures could push investors back toward safer assets and away from speculative crypto. Episodes of geopolitical stress, such as prolonged conflicts in key regions or large-scale sanctions regimes, tend to boost demand for the most liquid assets and leave thinly traded altcoins behind. Regulatory tightening is another major risk. Stricter enforcement on exchanges, stablecoins and token issuance could reduce retail access and make it harder for small projects to maintain on ramps.
Within the crypto market itself, the emergence of new gaming chains with more aggressive incentive programs could draw developers away from Phantasma. If the ecosystem fails to produce visible flagship applications, wallets and marketplaces over the coming years, token holders may eventually capitulate. Blockchain history is filled with examples of technically capable platforms that never achieved the critical mass of users and developers needed to justify sustained valuations.
Token level risks also remain. Even with most of the supply already released, concentration of holdings among early backers or a small group of large wallets can increase volatility. If these holders decide to exit in a low liquidity environment, price can gap down sharply. Without consistent demand from actual gas usage, staking or application level activity, SOUL risks becoming primarily a trading instrument driven by sentiment rather than a utility asset with underlying cash flow proxies.
In a mild bearish case, Phantasma could simply underperform the broader market. Bitcoin and major layer 1s might recover in a new cycle while small gaming tokens lag, leading to a slow bleed in relative terms even if nominal prices do not collapse. In a more severe scenario, a combination of weak adoption, loss of exchange liquidity and adverse regulatory or macro surprises could place substantial downward pressure on the token price.
Given today’s two cent level, the downside in percentage terms remains significant. Sustained trading below one cent would represent more than a fifty percent decline from current prices. If market confidence eroded further, prices could gravitate toward the fractions of a cent region where many abandoned small-cap tokens eventually settle. In those conditions, even small sell orders can cause large percentage moves due to thin order books.
The table below outlines some of the more plausible bearish triggers, together with corresponding short and long term price ranges that reflect the type of drawdowns seen in previous crypto cycles for small, niche projects that failed to keep pace with market leaders.
| Possible Trigger / Event | Phantasma (SOUL) Short Term Price (1-3 Years) | Phantasma (SOUL) Long Term Price (3-5 Years) |
|---|---|---|
| Prolonged macro tightening: Interest rates remain elevated, global growth slows and investors cut exposure to high risk assets, leading to persistent selling pressure and limited new capital for small-cap tokens. | $0.010 to $0.018 | $0.006 to $0.015 |
| Gaming sector rotation: Developers prefer larger chains with deeper liquidity and incentive programs, leaving Phantasma with few active flagship titles and declining on-chain activity over time. | $0.008 to $0.016 | $0.004 to $0.012 |
| Liquidity and delisting risks: Trading volumes fall, spreads widen and one or more exchanges delist SOUL for low activity, which makes entry and exit difficult and discourages new participants. | $0.005 to $0.012 | $0.002 to $0.008 |
| Regulatory headwinds emerge: Stricter rules on token listings, NFT trading or gaming tokens in key jurisdictions reduce user access and push Phantasma’s ecosystem to the fringes of the market. | $0.007 to $0.015 | $0.003 to $0.010 |
| Team or execution setbacks: Missed roadmap milestones, reduced public communication or loss of key contributors undermines confidence, leading to a gradual exit by long-term holders. | $0.006 to $0.014 | $0.003 to $0.009 |
| Security or technical issues: A serious bug, exploit or extended outage on the chain damages trust among developers and users, resulting in a sharp repricing and reluctance to build on the platform. | $0.004 to $0.010 | $0.001 to $0.006 |
In these bearish zones, the market capitalization of Phantasma could fall below $1 million and in the harshest outcomes potentially sink toward the low hundreds of thousands. At those levels, the token behaves less like a tradable asset and more like a thinly traded, speculative coupon on a struggling or dormant ecosystem. Recovery from such conditions is possible but historically rare, especially if user and developer attention has already migrated to alternative platforms.
For holders, the bearish scenario underscores the importance of monitoring real activity metrics rather than price alone. Daily active addresses, NFT marketplace volume, new project launches and developer engagement provide more useful signals than short term rallies or dips. If those fundamentals weaken while macro conditions deteriorate and liquidity dries up, the probability increases that SOUL drifts into the lower price bands outlined above and stays there for an extended period.