Liquidity Level on ZEC 1D.
A Liquidity Level formed on ZEC 1D. Historically the Liquidity Level on ZEC 1D resolved toward the primary target in 5470% of 64 instances before touching invalidation, with an expectancy of +0.06R per instance. This is descriptive analysis of a chart structure, not personalized guidance.
- Validation trigger
- 836.13
- Invalidation zone
- 810.9862
- Primary target
- 861.2738
- Historical win rate
- 5470%
- Expectancy
- +0.06R
- Sample size
- 64 instances
What formed
A liquidity level is a horizontal price zone where large amounts of resting orders cluster: limit buys, limit sells, or stops. Unlike a liquidity sweep which is an event, a liquidity level is a state that attracts price because the orders are simply sitting there.
It forms at prices with visible participation history: multiple prior touches, obvious swing points, round numbers, or historical range extremes. Levels tested three or more times without breaking are the strongest.
Key levels
| Level | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Validation trigger | 836.13 | Level that must react to confirm the formation |
| Invalidation zone | 810.9862 | Level that, if broken, negates the structural read |
| Primary target level | 861.2738 | First historical resolution zone |
| Secondary target level | 888 | Extended historical resolution zone |
| Distance to invalidation | 3.01% | Price move from validation trigger to invalidation |
Descriptive analysis of a chart structure. Not personalized guidance.
Historical resolution
How the Liquidity Level has actually resolved across our backtest sample, computed walk-forward on real historical candles.
| Coin | TF | N | Win % | Expectancy R | Avg hold (bars) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 1H | 22 | 46% | -0.24R | 3.0 |
| BTC | 4H | 72 | 49% | -0.15R | 3.4 |
| BTC | 6H | 91 | 45% | -0.18R | 3.4 |
| BTC | 8H | 116 | 53% | -0.03R | 3.7 |
| BTC | 12H | 110 | 44% | -0.25R | 4.1 |
| BTC | 1D | 78 | 41% | -0.19R | 3.6 |
| ETH | 1H | 21 | 71% | +0.29R | 4.1 |
| ETH | 4H | 75 | 49% | -0.10R | 3.4 |
| ETH | 6H | 89 | 38% | -0.31R | 3.4 |
| ETH | 8H | 105 | 42% | -0.29R | 4.2 |
| ETH | 12H | 91 | 43% | -0.14R | 5.0 |
| ETH | 1D | 74 | 46% | -0.14R | 4.2 |
| HYPE | 1H | 12 | 67% | +0.30R | 3.2 |
| HYPE | 4H | 33 | 52% | -0.13R | 3.1 |
| HYPE | 6H | 39 | 54% | +0.09R | 4.1 |
| HYPE | 8H | 37 | 51% | +0.01R | 4.3 |
| HYPE | 12H | 40 | 55% | +0.03R | 4.2 |
| HYPE | 1D | 26 | 50% | +0.15R | 4.2 |
| SOL | 1H | 22 | 50% | -0.29R | 5.5 |
| SOL | 4H | 88 | 41% | -0.35R | 3.2 |
| SOL | 6H | 108 | 43% | -0.28R | 3.5 |
| SOL | 8H | 116 | 42% | -0.21R | 4.2 |
| SOL | 12H | 99 | 46% | -0.03R | 4.6 |
| SOL | 1D | 80 | 46% | -0.06R | 4.0 |
| ZEC | 1H | 33 | 49% | -0.26R | 2.9 |
| ZEC | 4H | 90 | 51% | +0.09R | 3.4 |
| ZEC | 6H | 108 | 53% | +0.11R | 4.0 |
| ZEC | 8H | 126 | 52% | -0.05R | 3.9 |
| ZEC | 12H | 104 | 47% | -0.12R | 4.4 |
| ZEC | 1D | 64 | 55% | +0.06R | 5.8 |
How this pattern behaves
The reaction as price approaches the level. Clean rejections indicate the level is holding; slow drift-through indicates it is failing. We track both outcomes across our historical sample.
FAQ
Other liquidity level formations
Related
Descriptive analysis, not financial advice. Past performance does not predict future results.