AI vs 1,076 Human Traders
We gave Botsfolio AI the same money as 1,076 real human traders, on the same dates, and compared the results. 31.4% of the traders made money. Botsfolio AI made money in 88.6% of the same windows. It fell less than 93.6% of the traders and made more than 78.4% of them. Only 26 traders, 2.4%, beat it on both return and worst drop. Half of the traders lost 90% or more of their account at some point. Botsfolio AI never did. For the 844 traders it out-earned, the same money would have turned a combined $74.9 million loss into a $45.1 million gain. Told to keep falls to a minimum, its typical worst drop was 9%. The traders used real money with leverage on Hyperliquid. Botsfolio AI is tested on real market prices over each trader's exact dates, with a 0.10% fee per trade.
When an AI lab releases a new model, it publishes benchmark scores. Math tests, coding tests, reasoning tests, each one a number you can compare with other models and with people.
Trading AI almost never gets a test like that. You get a screenshot of a good month, a backtest with no drops in it, or a promise of 2% a day.
So we built a benchmark for trading. The opponent is real people trading real money, and every one of them gets matched with Botsfolio AI on the same money and the same dates. Here are the scores.
The test
A comparison is only fair if both sides play the same game, so every matchup follows the same rules.
- The human traders. We picked 2,500 accounts at random from the 32,839 that have traded at least $50,000 on Hyperliquid, a crypto exchange where every trade is public on the blockchain. The data comes from its public leaderboard and public API. We removed market makers and bots, meaning accounts that trade 150 or more times a day or around the clock, and accounts where money moved in and out too often to measure. That left 1,076 human traders.
- The window. Each trader is measured over their own active period, from their first trade to their last, between May 2024 and October 2026. The typical window was about a year.
- Botsfolio AI. For every trader, Botsfolio AI, running as the BTC & ETH Cycle Trader, starts with the same money on the trader's first day and runs to their last.
- Fees. The traders' results are after their own Hyperliquid fees and funding. They paid a median of 0.034% per trade, measured from their actual trades (Hyperliquid's fee schedule). Botsfolio AI was charged 0.10% on every trade, about three times as much. At Hyperliquid's own spot fees, its results improve by less than a point.
- The scores. Return is the gain or loss as a share of the most money the trader ever had in the account. Worst drop is the biggest fall from a high. Made money means the window ended above the starting money.
One question comes up first, so here's the answer up front: these are trading gains and losses, not deposits. The profit figure is the exchange's own trading profit and loss, from closed trades, fees and funding. Money added to or taken out of the account doesn't count. We checked it by rebuilding the profit from the actual trades for 59 accounts, and the answer to "did this trader make money" matched for 58 of them.
Botsfolio AI's benchmark scores
| Test | Botsfolio AI | Human traders |
|---|---|---|
Made money Share that ended above its starting money | 88.6% | 31.4% |
Lost 90% of the account Share that fell 90% or more at some point. Lower is better | 0% | 49.9% |
Typical worst drop Biggest fall from a high, median. Lower is better | 18.3% | 89.8% |
Months that lost 5% or more Typical share of months. Lower is better | 6.2% | 33.3% |
What $10,000 became Median over the same dates | $12,255 | $6,639 |
The biggest gaps are in losing. The typical trader's worst drop was 89.8%, against Botsfolio AI's 18.3%. Half of the traders lost 90% or more of their account at some point. Botsfolio AI never did.
Losing less is what Botsfolio AI does best, and it's also where human traders struggle most.
The AI in this benchmark is trading right now, with every move in public. Watch the BTC & ETH Cycle Trader
The head-to-head results
| Result | Traders |
|---|---|
Botsfolio AI did better on both return and worst drop | 801 (74.4%) |
The trader did better on both | 26 (2.4%) |
The trader made more, but with a deeper worst drop | 206 (19.1%) |
Botsfolio AI had the smaller worst drop | 1,007 (93.6%) |
Botsfolio AI made more | 844 (78.4%) |
Botsfolio AI had the better return per 1% of drop | 919 (85.4%) |
The typical trader in this group ended about $12,300 down. Half of them, 537 traders, lost 90% or more of their account at some point. That's what leverage does when a trade goes the wrong way: the account doesn't just dip, it gets wiped.
What if they had let Botsfolio AI trade?
Watch five real traders from the study against Botsfolio AI, with the same $10,000 over their exact dates: a typical one, a wiped-out one, a winner, a careful one, and one of the few who beat Botsfolio AI on both counts.
Lost 39% over 14 months, with a 79% drop along the way. Aug 2025 to Oct 2026.
Across the whole test, Botsfolio AI made more money than 844 of the 1,076 traders. Here is what those 844 accounts looked like, next to the same money with Botsfolio AI over the same dates:
| 844 traders | What they did | With Botsfolio AI |
|---|---|---|
Combined result | -$74.9M | +$45.1M |
Ended in a loss | 733 (86.8%) | 82 (9.7%) |
Lost 90% or more at some point | 505 (59.8%) | 0 (0%) |
$10,000 became | $4,395 | $12,475 |
Typical worst drop | 100% | 19% |
Botsfolio AI didn't win every window. 82 of these 844 still ended in a loss, and its worst window lost 17.9%. The difference is the size of the losses. Its worst window cost less than a fifth of the money, while most of these traders lost most of their account at some point.
The 2.4% who beat it, and the 19% who made more
Some traders are genuinely good. 26 of the 1,076 made more than Botsfolio AI and fell less while doing it. If you're one of them, you don't need us.
Another 206 traders, 19.1%, made more money than it, by a median of 28 percentage points. But to get there, their typical worst drop was 49%, against Botsfolio AI's 10% over the same dates. With leverage, a 49% fall is often a few bad days away from liquidation. Some of those traders will keep winning. Others are one bad week from joining the half who lost 90%.
That's why we score return per 1% of drop, not just return. A trader who makes 30% with a 50% drop and an AI that makes 20% with a 10% drop didn't take the same risk to get there. Botsfolio AI had the better return per 1% of drop against 85.4% of the traders.
Careful traders vs everyone else
We also split the 1,076 traders by their own worst drop and checked Botsfolio AI against each group:
| Group | Traders | Made money | Beat Botsfolio AI on both |
|---|---|---|---|
Careful Worst drop under 25% | 163 (15.1%) | 71.2% | 16.0% |
Moderate Worst drop 25% to 60% | 206 (19.1%) | 54.4% | 0% |
Aggressive Worst drop 60% to 90% | 170 (15.8%) | 37.6% | 0% |
Wiped out Worst drop 90% or more | 537 (49.9%) | 8.6% | 0% |
Careful traders hold their own: 71% of them made money, and some beat Botsfolio AI on both counts. Once a trader let a drop pass 25%, not one of them beat it on both. That's 85% of all the traders in the test.
This period was kind to Botsfolio AI, though. Tested from every monthly start since 2018, its typical biggest drop was about 37%, so expect deeper falls than this test shows.
Why most human traders lose
The results above aren't unusual. They match what other data shows about how people trade crypto:
- Leverage wipes people out. On October 10, 2025, 1.6 million traders were liquidated in 24 hours, $19.1 billion in positions, about 90% of them bets that prices would rise, according to CoinGlass.
- The crowd stays long, even when prices fall. In Bybit's public data, most BTC futures accounts were betting on a rise on 89% of days since January 2022. Over the last 12 months, while Bitcoin and Ethereum together fell 29%, it was 94% of days.
- Emotion drives the trades. In a Kraken survey of 1,248 US crypto holders, 84% said they had acted on fear of missing out, and 63% said emotional decisions had hurt their portfolio.
- It's not just traders. The Bank for International Settlements found that most crypto app users lost money on bitcoin between 2015 and 2022, because they bought after prices had already risen.
Most of it comes down to time, emotion and leverage. An AI doesn't get tired, scared or greedy, and Botsfolio AI doesn't use leverage at all. We wrote more about the habits behind it in why crypto traders lose money.
Who Botsfolio AI is for
The 2.4% who beat it don't need it. Botsfolio AI is built for the rest:
- People who trade on the side. 656 of the traders in this test had between $1,000 and $100,000 in their account. 26.4% of them made money. Botsfolio AI made money in 92.1% of the same windows, and $10,000 in this group became $2,455 for the typical trader against $12,472 with Botsfolio AI.
- People who have been liquidated, or are tired of watching leverage. Botsfolio AI trades spot coins with no leverage, so a bad day can't wipe the account.
- Holders who believe in Bitcoin and Ethereum but can't sit through 60% drops. Holding both fell 53% at its worst in the last year. You keep the coins you believe in, with a plan for the falls.
- People who want rules instead of hunches. Every trade follows the same rules, every time, at 3am and on the worst day of the month.
- People who mainly want to stop losing. Botsfolio AI can be told to keep falls to a minimum. More on that below.
- Beginners. You can watch it trade for free before putting in any money.
It's not for everyone. If you want 10x in a month, want leverage, or are already in the 2.4%, this isn't your product.
When we told Botsfolio AI to keep falls to a minimum
Botsfolio AI can also be told to put small falls first. That version runs as the BTC & ETH Steady Trader. We ran it against the same 1,076 traders, with the same money over the same dates:
| Test | Botsfolio AI, minimum fall | Human traders |
|---|---|---|
Made money Share that ended above its starting money | 72.5% | 31.4% |
Lost 90% of the account Share that fell 90% or more at some point. Lower is better | 0% | 49.9% |
Typical worst drop Biggest fall from a high, median. Lower is better | 9.0% | 89.8% |
Months that lost 5% or more Typical share of months. Lower is better | 0% | 33.3% |
What $10,000 became Median over the same dates | $10,333 | $6,639 |
Did better on both return and worst drop Head to head, share of the 1,076 matchups | 68.8% | 1.1% |
Smaller worst drop Head to head, share of the 1,076 matchups | 97.4% | 2.6% |
It almost never loses big. Its typical worst drop was 9%, a typical window had no month that lost 5% or more, and only 12 traders, 1.1%, beat it on both return and worst drop.
The price is growth. Its median gain was 3.3% over about a year, and about a quarter of its windows ended slightly down, the worst by 9.9%. Tested from every monthly start since 2018, its typical biggest drop was about 11%, against about 37% for the main Botsfolio AI. It suits people who mainly want to stop losing, more than people who want their money to grow.
How to try it
- Watch it first. Watch Botsfolio AI trade live: every buy, sell and stop it makes, in public, next to holding the same coins.
- Look at the AI from this test. The BTC & ETH Cycle Trader shows its full record and every trade. The minimum-fall version runs as the BTC & ETH Steady Trader.
- Start free with paper money. Build your own AI portfolio on the coins you pick and watch it trade on live prices. No card needed.
- Use real money when you're ready. Run the same AI on your own Coinbase, Kraken, Binance or Binance.US account. Your money stays on your exchange, the key can't withdraw, and you pay only when a trade fills. See pricing and how connecting works.
Method and limits
Botsfolio AI's numbers come from the rules it trades with today, tested on each trader's exact dates with real Coinbase prices and a 0.10% fee on every trade. The traders used real money, mostly with leverage, on many different coins. Their data comes from Hyperliquid's public leaderboard and API. Botsfolio AI trades spot BTC and ETH with no leverage.
The period, May 2024 to October 2026, ended with a weak year for Bitcoin and Ethereum, which suits Botsfolio AI. In a long, steady bull market it would make less than holding during the fast rallies, and the return gap against traders would likely narrow.
The measures lean in the traders' favor. Returns are divided by the most money a trader ever held, which makes their losses look smaller. Drops are measured on weekly snapshots, which misses falls inside a week. Accounts we couldn't classify as human or bot were left out. With 1,076 traders, the percentages have a margin of error of about 3 points. This is one exchange; independent analyses of Hyperliquid wallets have found 73% to 86% of them losing money over shorter windows.
How we picked the AI, how its portfolios are tested, and the tests they didn't pass are on the portfolio methodology page. To understand the drop numbers, read our guide to drawdown.
FAQ
Watch Botsfolio AI trade live
Botsfolio AI paper trades on the live market, and every entry, stop and exit is public.
- BTC & ETH Cycle Trader+24.1% vs -13.2% buy & hold in 2026 · biggest drop 8.7% vs 46.5%
- BTC & ETH Trend Rider+3.9% vs -13.2% buy & hold in 2026 · biggest drop 6.1% vs 46.5%
- BTC & ETH Steady Trader+2.6% vs -13.2% buy & hold in 2026 · biggest drop 3.2% vs 46.5%
- Bitcoin Cycle Trader+3.4% vs -7.5% buy & hold in 2026 · biggest drop 4.8% vs 39.6%
- Crypto Cycle Trader+29.1% vs +11.9% buy & hold in 2026 · biggest drop 12.4% vs 45.5%
- Altcoin Trend Rider+34.8% vs +18.1% buy & hold in 2026 · biggest drop 13.4% vs 50.2%
- Memecoin Trend Rider-6.3% vs -36.8% buy & hold in 2026 · biggest drop 10.5% vs 63.2%
How to read these numbers: the buy and hold comparison, biggest drop, and how the portfolios are tested.
See everything Botsfolio AI trades live
Paper trading on real prices. Not investment advice.
Educational analysis, not financial advice. Trader results come from Hyperliquid's public data. Botsfolio AI's results are tested on past prices. Trading crypto can lose money. Past performance does not predict future results.